Two cases recently argued before SCOTUS could narrow or expand warrantless searches - and they could reach back to what police are doing now Feb 2, 2018 2018 started off with a double-feature in the U.S. Supreme Court starring the Fourth Amendment and police authority to search and seize. Finally, in People v Sciacca (45 NY2d 122 [1978]), we held that tax investigators who had a valid warrant to search an automobile exceeded the scope of that warrant by entering into a private garage in order to execute the search of the vehicle. It's a fact that check cashing businesses handle a lot of cash and with a lot of cash comes a lot of reporting. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that because the search warrant contained no references to the vehicles to be searched, the record supported the finding that there was no probable cause to search the vehicles. Thus, to be valid, a search warrant must be "specific enough to leave no discretion to the executing officer" (People v Brown, 96 NY2d 80, 84 [2001], quoting People v Darling, 95 NY2d 530, 537 [2000]). The trial court suppressed the evidence derived from the devices, relying on persuasive authority from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to find that the delay between the seizure of the devices and the issuance of the search warrants for the data contained in them was unreasonable and thus violated appellees rights under the Fourth Amendment and Georgia law. In Sciacca, our statement that "a warrant to search a building does not include authority to search vehicles at the premises" was arguably dicta because the facts there involved whether a search warrant for a vehicle authorized an intrusion into a premises, and not vice versa. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. Defendant filed a motion to suppress, arguing that the factual allegations did not support a search of the vehicles located outside the residence. There is no justification for such an extreme position. No. The majority's rejoinderthat the absence of any discussion of the State Constitution "does not render our repeated citations to [it] meaningless" (majority op at 18)makes a parallel citation the equivalent of principled state constitutional discourse. "Listen to this mother, who lost two children to fentanyl poisoning, tell the truth about .

Accident In Titusville, Fl Today, Vibrance Yacht Port Jefferson Owner, 13 Week Cna Travel Contract With Housing In California, Criminal Fraternities 18th Century, Treatment For Paraphilic Disorders Quizlet, Articles R