econ job market rumors wiki

Why Should You Aim With Your Dominant Eye?, Cultural Similarities Between Us And Canada, Abc North Coast Presenters, Articles E
...">

Says model's too complex then suggests an addition which would have tripled the state space. It's going to be most accurate for economics, political science, public policy & other professional schools. Thorough review. Bad experience. General Economics Job Market Discussion (729,806) Micro Job Rumors (15,245) Macro Job Rumors (9,803) European Job Market (101,027) China Job Market (103,534) Not sure I'll ever submit something to RED again. The editor also read the paper and gave very good comments and suggestions. Yep, it is. Not recommended. One very good and helpful report. Single ref report had three very minor questions. After 8 months of waiting, got the shortest referee paper ever. The editor make effort to found the right people to read the paper. The comments from the editor are also disappointing: his main suggestion is to send our 7,500 words paper to economics letters. Obviously, being turned down after a two-year long process and a very extensive revision is bad for a young author. Rejected with two reports with fair remarks. They will help to improve the paper. Will submit again in the future! One very good report, one OK. One referee report indicated it would be a better fit in a different journal. I inquired a few times, and they responded promptly and politely, but sitting on a manuscript for a year is obviously unacceptable. Bigger joke than the article I sent them. It was clear that the referees read the paper and provided appropriate comments. In general, efficient journal, 2 months, 2 good reports & 1 trash report, fair outcome and ok process. Avoid this journal by any means. Disappointing. No meaningful comments. topics should probably be closely related to banking. Top scholars if it comes to RCTs, but no broaded view. Desk reject after few days with some useful suggestions. Clear suggestions with R&R decision from Hillary Hoynes. Neither referee is hostile. Editor said he appreciated the previous paper but seemed to reject this one (which is probably better) since it fits in with a similar literature. In really sped things up. Decent referee reports, good turnaround time. Soon it became like a bar that doesn't kick out any assholes and now its a collection of assholes who happen to do economics. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Two referee reports.

Why Should You Aim With Your Dominant Eye?, Cultural Similarities Between Us And Canada, Abc North Coast Presenters, Articles E